Bakersfield, CA vs Columbia, MO
Cost of Living Comparison
Columbia, MO is more affordable by 11.4 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Bakersfield, CA | Columbia, MO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 89.4 | +11.4 |
| Housing | 90.3 | 69.2 | +21.0 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 94.2 | +11.0 |
| Utilities | 158.3 | 86.0 | +72.3 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 93.0 | +7.2 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Bakersfield, CA | Columbia, MO |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $63,883 | $65,863 |
| Median Home Value | $282,800 | $225,300 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $1,161 | $981 |
| Per Capita Income | $27,976 | $36,122 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bakersfield, CA or Columbia, MO cheaper to live in?
Columbia, MO is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 11.4 index points (Bakersfield, CA: 100.9, Columbia, MO: 89.4).
Where is housing cheaper, Bakersfield, CA or Columbia, MO?
Housing is more affordable in Columbia, MO. Housing index: Bakersfield, CA (90.3) vs Columbia, MO (69.2).