Bakersfield, CA vs Gulfport, MS
Cost of Living Comparison
Gulfport, MS is more affordable by 10.9 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Bakersfield, CA | Gulfport, MS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 90.0 | +10.9 |
| Housing | 90.3 | 67.9 | +22.4 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 96.2 | +8.9 |
| Utilities | 158.3 | 76.3 | +81.9 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 96.1 | +4.2 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Bakersfield, CA | Gulfport, MS |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $63,883 | $58,287 |
| Median Home Value | $282,800 | $175,800 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $1,161 | $1,010 |
| Per Capita Income | $27,976 | $31,154 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bakersfield, CA or Gulfport, MS cheaper to live in?
Gulfport, MS is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 10.9 index points (Bakersfield, CA: 100.9, Gulfport, MS: 90.0).
Where is housing cheaper, Bakersfield, CA or Gulfport, MS?
Housing is more affordable in Gulfport, MS. Housing index: Bakersfield, CA (90.3) vs Gulfport, MS (67.9).