Bakersfield, CA vs Rochester, MN
Cost of Living Comparison
Rochester, MN is more affordable by 10.1 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Bakersfield, CA | Rochester, MN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 90.8 | +10.1 |
| Housing | 90.3 | 78.6 | +11.7 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 95.4 | +9.7 |
| Utilities | 158.3 | 87.4 | +70.9 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 92.2 | +8.1 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Bakersfield, CA | Rochester, MN |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $63,883 | $86,788 |
| Median Home Value | $282,800 | $266,900 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $1,161 | $1,115 |
| Per Capita Income | $27,976 | $46,938 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bakersfield, CA or Rochester, MN cheaper to live in?
Rochester, MN is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 10.1 index points (Bakersfield, CA: 100.9, Rochester, MN: 90.8).
Where is housing cheaper, Bakersfield, CA or Rochester, MN?
Housing is more affordable in Rochester, MN. Housing index: Bakersfield, CA (90.3) vs Rochester, MN (78.6).