Bakersfield, CA vs Tulsa, OK
Cost of Living Comparison
Tulsa, OK is more affordable by 11.7 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Bakersfield, CA | Tulsa, OK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 89.2 | +11.7 |
| Housing | 90.3 | 68.2 | +22.1 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 93.8 | +11.4 |
| Utilities | 158.3 | 73.9 | +84.4 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 95.5 | +4.8 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Bakersfield, CA | Tulsa, OK |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $63,883 | $65,784 |
| Median Home Value | $282,800 | $188,400 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $1,161 | $982 |
| Per Capita Income | $27,976 | $36,669 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bakersfield, CA or Tulsa, OK cheaper to live in?
Tulsa, OK is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 11.7 index points (Bakersfield, CA: 100.9, Tulsa, OK: 89.2).
Where is housing cheaper, Bakersfield, CA or Tulsa, OK?
Housing is more affordable in Tulsa, OK. Housing index: Bakersfield, CA (90.3) vs Tulsa, OK (68.2).