Columbia, MO vs Pittsfield, MA
Cost of Living Comparison
Columbia, MO is more affordable by 5.7 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Columbia, MO | Pittsfield, MA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 89.4 | 95.1 | -5.7 |
| Housing | 69.2 | 73.5 | -4.2 |
| Goods | 94.2 | 97.0 | -2.8 |
| Utilities | 86.0 | 153.7 | -67.7 |
| Other Services | 93.0 | 101.2 | -8.2 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Columbia, MO | Pittsfield, MA |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $65,863 | $69,744 |
| Median Home Value | $225,300 | $266,400 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $981 | $1,003 |
| Per Capita Income | $36,122 | $45,300 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Columbia, MO or Pittsfield, MA cheaper to live in?
Columbia, MO is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 5.7 index points (Columbia, MO: 89.4, Pittsfield, MA: 95.1).
Where is housing cheaper, Columbia, MO or Pittsfield, MA?
Housing is more affordable in Columbia, MO. Housing index: Columbia, MO (69.2) vs Pittsfield, MA (73.5).