Fresno, CA vs Missoula, MT
Cost of Living Comparison
Missoula, MT is more affordable by 5.7 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Fresno, CA | Missoula, MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 102.2 | 96.4 | +5.7 |
| Housing | 95.7 | 94.9 | +0.8 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 96.0 | +9.2 |
| Utilities | 161.0 | 72.1 | +88.9 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 98.7 | +1.6 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Fresno, CA | Missoula, MT |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $67,756 | $66,840 |
| Median Home Value | $338,200 | $382,400 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $1,207 | $1,068 |
| Per Capita Income | $30,130 | $40,311 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Fresno, CA or Missoula, MT cheaper to live in?
Missoula, MT is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 5.7 index points (Fresno, CA: 102.2, Missoula, MT: 96.4).
Where is housing cheaper, Fresno, CA or Missoula, MT?
Housing is more affordable in Missoula, MT. Housing index: Fresno, CA (95.7) vs Missoula, MT (94.9).