Missoula, MT vs Napa, CA
Cost of Living Comparison
Missoula, MT is more affordable by 16.1 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Missoula, MT | Napa, CA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.4 | 112.6 | -16.1 |
| Housing | 94.9 | 197.4 | -102.5 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 105.2 | -9.2 |
| Utilities | 72.1 | 156.5 | -84.5 |
| Other Services | 98.7 | 100.3 | -1.6 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Missoula, MT | Napa, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $66,840 | $105,809 |
| Median Home Value | $382,400 | $794,500 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $1,068 | $2,037 |
| Per Capita Income | $40,311 | $54,306 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Missoula, MT or Napa, CA cheaper to live in?
Missoula, MT is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 16.1 index points (Missoula, MT: 96.4, Napa, CA: 112.6).
Where is housing cheaper, Missoula, MT or Napa, CA?
Housing is more affordable in Missoula, MT. Housing index: Missoula, MT (94.9) vs Napa, CA (197.4).