Missoula, MT vs San Francisco, CA
Cost of Living Comparison
Missoula, MT is more affordable by 19.2 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Missoula, MT | San Francisco, CA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.4 | 115.6 | -19.2 |
| Housing | 94.9 | 194.7 | -99.8 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 108.5 | -12.5 |
| Utilities | 72.1 | 172.6 | -100.5 |
| Other Services | 98.7 | 106.2 | -7.5 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Missoula, MT | San Francisco, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $66,840 | $129,315 |
| Median Home Value | $382,400 | $1,073,300 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $1,068 | $2,336 |
| Per Capita Income | $40,311 | $68,958 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Missoula, MT or San Francisco, CA cheaper to live in?
Missoula, MT is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 19.2 index points (Missoula, MT: 96.4, San Francisco, CA: 115.6).
Where is housing cheaper, Missoula, MT or San Francisco, CA?
Housing is more affordable in Missoula, MT. Housing index: Missoula, MT (94.9) vs San Francisco, CA (194.7).