Napa, CA vs Port St. Lucie, FL
Cost of Living Comparison
Port St. Lucie, FL is more affordable by 12.3 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Napa, CA | Port St. Lucie, FL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 112.6 | 100.2 | +12.3 |
| Housing | 197.4 | 113.6 | +83.8 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 96.2 | +8.9 |
| Utilities | 156.5 | 87.0 | +69.5 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 98.9 | +1.4 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Napa, CA | Port St. Lucie, FL |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $105,809 | $69,429 |
| Median Home Value | $794,500 | $293,400 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $2,037 | $1,366 |
| Per Capita Income | $54,306 | $39,300 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Napa, CA or Port St. Lucie, FL cheaper to live in?
Port St. Lucie, FL is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 12.3 index points (Napa, CA: 112.6, Port St. Lucie, FL: 100.2).
Where is housing cheaper, Napa, CA or Port St. Lucie, FL?
Housing is more affordable in Port St. Lucie, FL. Housing index: Napa, CA (197.4) vs Port St. Lucie, FL (113.6).