Napa, CA vs Rochester, MN
Cost of Living Comparison
Rochester, MN is more affordable by 21.7 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Napa, CA | Rochester, MN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 112.6 | 90.8 | +21.7 |
| Housing | 197.4 | 78.6 | +118.8 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 95.4 | +9.7 |
| Utilities | 156.5 | 87.4 | +69.1 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 92.2 | +8.1 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Napa, CA | Rochester, MN |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $105,809 | $86,788 |
| Median Home Value | $794,500 | $266,900 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $2,037 | $1,115 |
| Per Capita Income | $54,306 | $46,938 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Napa, CA or Rochester, MN cheaper to live in?
Rochester, MN is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 21.7 index points (Napa, CA: 112.6, Rochester, MN: 90.8).
Where is housing cheaper, Napa, CA or Rochester, MN?
Housing is more affordable in Rochester, MN. Housing index: Napa, CA (197.4) vs Rochester, MN (78.6).