Napa, CA vs San Francisco, CA
Cost of Living Comparison
Napa, CA is more affordable by 3.1 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Napa, CA | San Francisco, CA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 112.6 | 115.6 | -3.1 |
| Housing | 197.4 | 194.7 | +2.7 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 108.5 | -3.3 |
| Utilities | 156.5 | 172.6 | -16.0 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 106.2 | -5.9 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Napa, CA | San Francisco, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $105,809 | $129,315 |
| Median Home Value | $794,500 | $1,073,300 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $2,037 | $2,336 |
| Per Capita Income | $54,306 | $68,958 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Napa, CA or San Francisco, CA cheaper to live in?
Napa, CA is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 3.1 index points (Napa, CA: 112.6, San Francisco, CA: 115.6).
Where is housing cheaper, Napa, CA or San Francisco, CA?
Housing is more affordable in San Francisco, CA. Housing index: Napa, CA (197.4) vs San Francisco, CA (194.7).