Napa, CA vs St. Louis, MO
Cost of Living Comparison
St. Louis, MO is more affordable by 17.5 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Napa, CA | St. Louis, MO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 112.6 | 95.1 | +17.5 |
| Housing | 197.4 | 79.0 | +118.4 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 100.0 | +5.2 |
| Utilities | 156.5 | 69.9 | +86.6 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 98.6 | +1.6 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Napa, CA | St. Louis, MO |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $105,809 | $75,316 |
| Median Home Value | $794,500 | $219,000 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $2,037 | $1,033 |
| Per Capita Income | $54,306 | $42,724 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Napa, CA or St. Louis, MO cheaper to live in?
St. Louis, MO is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 17.5 index points (Napa, CA: 112.6, St. Louis, MO: 95.1).
Where is housing cheaper, Napa, CA or St. Louis, MO?
Housing is more affordable in St. Louis, MO. Housing index: Napa, CA (197.4) vs St. Louis, MO (79.0).