Napa, CA vs Walla Walla, WA
Cost of Living Comparison
Walla Walla, WA is more affordable by 14.0 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Napa, CA | Walla Walla, WA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 112.6 | 98.5 | +14.0 |
| Housing | 197.4 | 86.6 | +110.9 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 105.0 | +0.1 |
| Utilities | 156.5 | 94.3 | +62.2 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 99.5 | +0.8 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Napa, CA | Walla Walla, WA |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $105,809 | $66,635 |
| Median Home Value | $794,500 | $331,600 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $2,037 | $1,044 |
| Per Capita Income | $54,306 | $34,476 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Napa, CA or Walla Walla, WA cheaper to live in?
Walla Walla, WA is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 14.0 index points (Napa, CA: 112.6, Walla Walla, WA: 98.5).
Where is housing cheaper, Napa, CA or Walla Walla, WA?
Housing is more affordable in Walla Walla, WA. Housing index: Napa, CA (197.4) vs Walla Walla, WA (86.6).