San Francisco, CA vs Walla Walla, WA
Cost of Living Comparison
Walla Walla, WA is more affordable by 17.1 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | San Francisco, CA | Walla Walla, WA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 115.6 | 98.5 | +17.1 |
| Housing | 194.7 | 86.6 | +108.1 |
| Goods | 108.5 | 105.0 | +3.4 |
| Utilities | 172.6 | 94.3 | +78.3 |
| Other Services | 106.2 | 99.5 | +6.7 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | San Francisco, CA | Walla Walla, WA |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $129,315 | $66,635 |
| Median Home Value | $1,073,300 | $331,600 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $2,336 | $1,044 |
| Per Capita Income | $68,958 | $34,476 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is San Francisco, CA or Walla Walla, WA cheaper to live in?
Walla Walla, WA is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 17.1 index points (San Francisco, CA: 115.6, Walla Walla, WA: 98.5).
Where is housing cheaper, San Francisco, CA or Walla Walla, WA?
Housing is more affordable in Walla Walla, WA. Housing index: San Francisco, CA (194.7) vs Walla Walla, WA (86.6).